/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #13653394

379KiB, 1920x1080, Screenshot (245).png

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Medschool fags and doctors, can you tell me why FDA voted against boosters?

Anonymous Fri 17 Sep 20:20:45 2021 No.13653394 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>13653449 >>13653461 >>13653570

Asking this here because I don't trust the shizos over at /pol/.

What went wrong in the studies? What doesnt the fda know?

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1631909138019.jpg, 233KiB, 2344x1419

Anonymous Fri 17 Sep 2021 20:35:43 No.13653449 Report

Quoted By: >>13654242

>>13653394
it's a fucking deathshot and they know it
>what went wrong in the studies
efficacy dropped between the first and second shot, 4x the amount of heart attacks in the treatment group of Pfizer's own studies, at least 2 people die as a result of the vaccine for every 1 life saved (using data from many countries, all with similarly high rates of vaccine injury and death). If you're that curious, listen to the full meeting.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 17 Sep 2021 20:37:50 No.13653461 Report

Quoted By: >>13653528

>>13653394
>being this late to the party
Sci has been trying to warn you for months

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 17 Sep 2021 20:58:39 No.13653528 Report

Quoted By:

>>13653461
it was 60/40 on sci. vax shills are nowhere to be found today though.

They can't even admit they were wrong, pathetic.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO COVID19-VaxStatus_July16-Aug15.png, 201KiB, 1200x628

Anonymous Fri 17 Sep 2021 21:06:41 No.13653570 Report

Quoted By:

>>13653394
Not a medfag, but the vaccine still protects most people from hospitalization and death. So your average vaccinated person does not need a booster. Maybe an immune compromised person or an elderly person might need one. But the FDA was voting on whether to recommend boosters for everybody. Which is obviously what money-grubbing Pfizer wants- the government paying them to give everyone medicine they don't really need. So FDA had to step in and say that's not necessary.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 17 Sep 2021 23:59:30 No.13654109 Report

Quoted By:

>reason 1 they voted no: Pfizer provided little data on the safety of extra doses
>reason 2 they voted no: doubts about the value of mass boosters, rather than ones targeted to specific groups (older Americans and other high-risk groups)
>"I don’t think a booster dose is going to significantly contribute to controlling the pandemic and I think it’s important that the main message we transmit is that we’ve got to get everyone two doses."
>IT IS CLEAR THAT THE UNVACCINATED ARE DRIVING TRANSMISSION IN THE UNITED STATES
Also they just approved it for 65 and up.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Sep 2021 01:06:44 No.13654242 Report

Quoted By:

>>13653449
t. schizo

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches