>>13644558>this is exactly, mathematically identical to what >>13644050 (OP) does, exept it phrases it in terms of wavenumbers. you are so fucking deep in dunning kruger, it's not even funny.mathematically perhaps, but not epistemologically.
Bohr said something can only have certain amounts of angular momentum. the question remains to be answered why?
in the op noting is just assumed to be discrete. there is assumed to be a heterogeneous boundary around the electron. this isn't as much of an assumption but an observation from Comptons experiments. then it is assumed that the boundary, like all other junctions between dissimilar regions can sustain modes of vibration.
mathematically it is the same, but physics involves epistemology. you have t justify why you wrote that equation.
