>>13643911You know, I accept your cat theory. You have something there.
Now it's the time to prove it's viability to the world. Make some predictions calculated on the interdimensional cat theory, then start taking measurements and look for proof. Maybe hyderogen nuclei have quantum-level cat pawprints on them. Idk, it's your theory, figure it out.
>>13643908Math is language. You don't ask people to prove language or music are real.
As long as you can communicate to people that two apples in the right hand and two apples in the left hand totals to four apples, you're good.
>>13643919That's a possible scenario, but not one in vogue at the moment. Current prediction is that gravity is not strong enough to overcome the expansion of the universe, and so stuff will stay more or less tha same for hundreds of trillions of years while the stars go out, (possibly) black holes evaporate, and eventually protons decay, if they indeed do.
But we are missing crucial components of the math needed to definitely support any end of the universe theory. We just don't really know.
