>>13650641>The vaccines still help quite a bit to lower transmission even with delta so they are huge for flattening the curve.I doubt they're doing enough if you need 3-4 jabs.
That sounds like they're seriously flawed in fact.
And that's what happens when you remove liability and remove the oversight of these organizations to churn this out. Now people say that was purely for profit, I disagree, there is definitely a necessity of time at stake.
But unfortunately the flaws in this tactic far exceeded our expectations and the inability of undeveloped nations and the USA at curbing this disease really forced this thing to get too out of hand for vaccines to help.
I think the US's anti-welfare state has utterly failed with this disease.
In fact, I think all nations, including communist nations, ironically failed on the welfare front with maintaining business integrity through the quarantine process. Simply put, we are not a developed civilization yet. We're now realizing that.
Reliance on either lock down or jab alone is insanity when this thing is mutating out of control and finding too many reservoirs to manage without totalitarian enforcement.
>The vaccinated will be mostly fine, unvaxxed will flood hospitalsI'm not certain about that. The industry's advertising campaign is disgusting and people are merely pushing content from the sources of developers, not third parties. You actually have to dig a bit to find third party oversight. Third party oversight should have been the main source of confirmation on these products.
But.. at the same time that takes up a lot of time. So it's a catch 22.
>We need to at some point let the unvaxxed get natural immunity, at that point they are as protected or even more so then vaxxed pop. I disagree because I'm no longer convinced there is natural immunity of vaccinated immunity to this thing because of the mutation rate.