>>13634374I don't understand. The first 'spark' I suppose goes all the way back to when you were an embryo and the stem-cell first became a neuron. And it's been cycling through ever since.
>>13634431No. I wouldn't say that. When did I say they have an insight intuitive or otherwise. No nothing like that.
>but it just floods their conscious part resulting in malfunction and ultimate confusion.No. When did I single out 'conscious part'?
Not at all. The theory is that these 'inhibitors', for example an inhibitor that tells you a dog is not a cat, a very important ontological distinction inhibitor may... for the sake of argument, not switch on, and suddenly you have dog-cat-foxes.
It's like when you want to show the color green but you get too much red and blue in the image so you end up with a detailless mush.
Of course this is a gross oversimplification for the sake of analogy - Schizos as I understand it go through periods of lucidity and periods of hallucination. And there's no reason to believe that the inhibition breakdowns are universal across all concepts, after all the mere existence of 'dog' or even a Witgensteinian familial resemblance like the dog-cat-fox suggests some lower level earlier-generation inhibitors are working to one extent or another. I.e. fur not skin, 4 legs not 2 or no wings... perhaps it's "not a bear". Of course the attributes are unlikely to be dichotomous, I'm just simplifying for the sake of analogy
