>>13634099most of them would keep writing nonsenses mixed with some actual ""valid"" points. They can manage to dodge the responsibility of proving what they say, or ignoring any proof against them. Then they can invoke the "traditional logic reasoning is a fallacy" or even simply replying "that proves nothing", like if they were immune to a counterargument.
Which reminds me to not take any kind of argument with stubborn people, those are the worst, they will see whatever they want to see and try to put you down no matter what. I had to deal with fuckers like those in my life, professional life and never came nothing good out of that. I try to ignore most of the time, but sometimes the level of stupidity is unbearable.
