>>13626800>i have no argument>you're not using words in the way that conforms to my worldview you dangerous naziyou sound like a vaxxer NPC. how about telling me what "..." is supposed to mean then according to you? we can work from there.
>>13627026But it's not a number in and of itself. Just as, for instance, 0.333... is not a number. You cannot actually have an infinite amount of terms, stop being schizo. What you mean by 0.999... is actually the following sequence:
0.9, 0.99, 0.999, ... = sum from n=1 to k of 9*(1/10)^n, as you let k grow arbitrarily large.
as you take the limit of this geometric series you will clearly see that it converges to 1. the midwits who say 0.999... does not equal 1 clearly have no concept of the infinite. there is nothing after infinity. when you take the difference of 1.000... - 0.999... you will end up with 0.000... , with no little 1 at the end. there is nothing that can come after an infinite sequence of digits by definition.
