>>13623036Hey sci, I'm midwit about biology. Is this guy legit? My limited understanding is Ivermectin had some initial success against covid in early trials, but one of the major trials that supported this was falsified. So ivermectin's viability against covid is in question.
This guy seems sus because he's pushing ivermectin is the miracle cure narrative without acknowledging the setbacks. The left is going 180 claiming ivermectin is horse dewormer, is lying by omission because there's a human version used widely for parasites, tho some people have used the horse version.
Do I have a good enough understanding about these events? Please correct me if I got things wrong. Thanks.