>>13622262This feels exactly the same as his graph nonsense.
Is the takeaway some mish mash abouh distributed computation, multithreading, shared supercomputers?
That's what people do nowadays, in the 2020s, Stephen, yes, exactly. People use graphs for things, yes, Stephen. Can you add something? How does one use your model? Not even asking about its advantages, because like the graphs baloney, you can't even get started with it if you don't know what it's supposed to do.
Unless it's just shameless marketing of his homework solver for undergrads and hs students that "works" across multiple fields, "works" in the same way that wikipedia has articles about biology AND physics.
