/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #13621743

399KiB, 871x980, 1631045197219.png

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Thu 09 Sep 16:10:32 2021 No.13621743 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>13621788 >>13621801 >>13621956 >>13622073 >>13622079 >>13623325 >>13623472

How are all humans classified as a single species?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 09 Sep 2021 16:12:35 No.13621750 Report

Quoted By: >>13621845 >>13621956

because we can crossbreed

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 09 Sep 2021 16:19:35 No.13621788 Report

Quoted By: >>13621956

>>13621743
dogs are all same subspecies.
>nose is 1mm wider, jaw is 1mm wider, etc therefore it's another species
sounds like anthropocentrism to me, reported to the biopolice

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 09 Sep 2021 16:22:05 No.13621801 Report

Quoted By: >>13621956 >>13623479

>>13621743
because of politics. I'd post the picture of people calling a blood bank racist for saying they need minorities to donate blood to other minorities if I had it. genetically wolves are more closely related to foxes than asians are to africans, but don't tell people that.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 09 Sep 2021 16:32:08 No.13621845 Report

Quoted By:

>>13621750
So can these https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_genetic_hybrids (they aren't all sterile, either).

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1616263189551.jpg, 312KiB, 1024x1444

Anonymous Thu 09 Sep 2021 17:00:43 No.13621956 Report

Quoted By:

>>13621743
Because of politics.

>>13621750
So can plenty of animals from different species. Pic related, for example.

>>13621788
Right, but wolves are 37 subspecies.

>>13621801
That's wolves and coyotes, not foxes. They are another example of different species that naturally hybridize and make fertile offspring. Two other species, the Red Wolf and the Eastern Wolf, are actually just populations of coyote/eolf hybrids.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 09 Sep 2021 17:26:34 No.13622073 Report

Quoted By: >>13622109

>>13621743

Diffrent Species: No

Different Subspecies: Yes. It's akin to comparing different breeds of domestic cat.

If Neanderthals were still alive today they would be classified as a different species.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO unnamed.jpg, 63KiB, 509x512

Anonymous Thu 09 Sep 2021 17:29:06 No.13622079 Report

Quoted By: >>13622125

>>13621743

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 09 Sep 2021 17:35:23 No.13622109 Report

Quoted By: >>13622116 >>13622641

>>13622073
>If Neanderthals were still alive today they would be classified as a different species.
no they would not. We even classify aboriginals and caucasians as the same species

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO b4c8c4b31094f2ab352fc2e1ccb4662a.jpg, 224KiB, 736x1104

Anonymous Thu 09 Sep 2021 17:37:51 No.13622116 Report

Quoted By:

>>13622109
I mean just look at it. LOOK!
It's clearly a different species

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 09 Sep 2021 17:39:26 No.13622125 Report

Quoted By:

>>13622079
Nigga youre bananas

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 09 Sep 2021 20:24:06 No.13622641 Report

Quoted By: >>13622658

>>13622109
>no they would not.
Why? It seems h. sapiens male and neanderthal female could not have viable offspring; last I heard we do not know of neanderthal mitochondrial DNA.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 09 Sep 2021 20:30:23 No.13622658 Report

Quoted By: >>13622732

>>13622641
There's no neanderthal Y chromosome either.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 09 Sep 2021 21:01:18 No.13622732 Report

Quoted By:

>>13622658
OK, wouldn't that point to sapiens and neanderthals being separate species or sub-species? Where does the limit go?

I noticed old depictions of neanderthals made them look like monobrowed brutes but recent ones look fairly civilised.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 09 Sep 2021 22:30:05 No.13623034 Report

Quoted By: >>13624371

the genetic variation between the above is significantly, significantly higher than in the bottom.

Sometimes looks can be deceiving.

Might make one of these stupid fucking images myself with a thylacine and wolf skull labelled "LITERALLY DIFFERENT ORDER"
and then a male and female angler fish going "SAME SPECIES?!?!?!"

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 09 Sep 2021 22:42:13 No.13623072 Report

Quoted By: >>13624356 >>13624371

Honest question to those who defend the different species thesis: how should mixed race individuals (including those who have just a small amount of blood from other race) be classified? By phenotype? Then races considered would be caucasoid, negroid, mongoloid and australoid, a set that allows for broad inclusion of different regional groups such as Syrians and Europeans as caucasoid or Thais and Native Americans as mongoloid?

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO Bottlenose Dolphins and False Ki (...).jpg, 66KiB, 700x467

Anonymous Fri 10 Sep 2021 00:56:43 No.13623325 Report

Quoted By: >>13623474

>>13621743
DIFFERENT SPECIES
ONE RACE

LET THE MUTTENING BEGIN!!!

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 10 Sep 2021 01:44:47 No.13623418 Report

Quoted By:

I have big mouth and dark skinz therefore different species than small mouth light skinz peepoo :) *fart*

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO og-theodora-6589.jpg, 70KiB, 700x360

Anonymous Fri 10 Sep 2021 02:06:38 No.13623472 Report

Quoted By:

>>13621743
Because the Jewish species wants to enslave the nonJewish pedigree choice blend USDA Amerimutt Golem.
Pic related is a "white roman" woman who was totally nice to her subjects.
https://youtu.be/PehCn_3kyw4

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 10 Sep 2021 02:07:39 No.13623474 Report

Quoted By:

>>13623325
(((felow dolphins we cannot swim together without letting sharks into our school!)))

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 10 Sep 2021 02:08:59 No.13623479 Report

Quoted By:

>>13621801
Holy shit

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 10 Sep 2021 07:39:37 No.13624356 Report

Quoted By:

>>13623072
Same as with other hybrids.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 10 Sep 2021 07:49:09 No.13624371 Report

Quoted By:

>>13623072
I don't really have an opinion on whether it should be done, but it wouldn't be complicated. You can just do it in the same way we do with other hybrids (even of (sub)-species which occupy a very large geographical area, like Panthera's https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panthera_hybrid).

>>13623034
>the genetic variation between the above is significantly, significantly higher than in the bottom.
This would be a good argument if a difference in genetic "overlap" would be the deciding factor demarcating between different species, which it isn't. Fact is that we have a completely different taxonomic ruleset for humans than we do for all other animals.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches