>>13610540>Don't you guys want to "return to tradition"?Imagine being such a brainlet you attach your local flavour of petty culture war to every post you read.
But since you ask: I am absolutely not pro-tradition. I look down on ideas of Christian nuclear families, which unlike often touted by conservatives don't represent the natural mode of human child rearing, which is instead one of the kid being raised by an entire community/tribal unit.
LGBT exists. Dysphoric trans exists, everything else is a fetish, and it's okay it's a fetish. But at the same time I find LGBT issues are naturally not mainstream issues and should not have a mainstream visibility.
But mostly, I am critical of it due to effects beside petty cultural debates, but more on the direct effects on civilizations. If the opposing party of the current culture war would be, idk,
inuit basket weavers, I'd still speak out. I don't care about them, but the *effects of the* effects of what they are touting.
Google rat utopia.
All of this current gender/queer shit is purely politics, 0% policy.
Ultimately I think the current era is a transitional one culminating in some transhumanist arrangement where gender becomes a non-issue as you can freely swap between them, but where gender norms are alive and well, still entrenched. Transhumanist tech will make it possible to regard you as the woman you want to be without having to play some multilateral game of deception, dishonesty, claims of thoughtcrime, etc.
