i don't want to drag down board quality which to me appears as a nebulous subjective term. used as an excuse for removing things one doesn't like. so how does this not pertain to science and math? this is a discussion of findings published in nature. is it the phrasing that is the issue? not high brow enough? or is it the finding not conforming to preconceptions that is so upsetting? please tell me what is "off-topic" about this post such that it has been scrubbed twice today? i would like to know to be a more quality contributor to this laotian basket weaving symposium.