>there is no mechanism of action to make us concerned about the long term effects of smoking. Anyone who says smoking MIGHT be dangerous is an uneducated pleep who needs to trust the science.
>oh opps, ciggerates actually cause lung cancer and heart disease
>there is no mechanism of action to suggest asbestos might be dangerous. Anyone saying we should consider not using it is LITERALLY CAUSING FIRES and needs to trust the science
>oh opps it turns out breathing in asbestos fibres is actually highly carcinogenic
>There is no mechanism of action to suggest thalodimide is dangerous. Anyone who says we should consider not using it until we know its safe in the long term is an anti-science conservatard who needs to trust the science.
>there is no mechanism of action to suggest mRNA covid vaccines might be dangerous.
Sounds a little cocky IMO
>oh opps, ciggerates actually cause lung cancer and heart disease
>there is no mechanism of action to suggest asbestos might be dangerous. Anyone saying we should consider not using it is LITERALLY CAUSING FIRES and needs to trust the science
>oh opps it turns out breathing in asbestos fibres is actually highly carcinogenic
>There is no mechanism of action to suggest thalodimide is dangerous. Anyone who says we should consider not using it until we know its safe in the long term is an anti-science conservatard who needs to trust the science.
>there is no mechanism of action to suggest mRNA covid vaccines might be dangerous.
Sounds a little cocky IMO
