>>13588061It's not "false" when you identify it as an "accurate description".
>>13588058>Jesus christ isn't reddit a good enough website for you grifters?No it isn't, that's why they keep coming
>>13588083>you could just answer the question You never asked a question. You made a half-assed statement that was patently absurd. Unless you're OP?
>Because it is a relevant questionWhat is?
>As mentioned, outright falsified studies are rare because they lead to people's heads getting chopped and there can be no excuse for your actionsSee? That's not a question.
>But malicious or even just naively optimistic research practices can heavily skew your data to the point where it is no longer meaningful, and it becomes harder to say what is intentionally fucked.This answers OP's question.
>As for drug companies, which you seem to insinuate with your pictureDrugs? No, any product sold for a profit. Except for a few particular ones. For some reason.
>yes they will bend the truth to turn a profit and have done so multiple times in the past.So science lies for profit! There ya go.
