>correlation is not causation
This lil nigga is a psyop isn't it? This argument is brought up against every single questionable and sketchy research that might endanger authority.
It can be said about almost every research on any topic if the results aren't as clear as daylight where people are only saying "hmm there could be a causation" but instantly the discussion gets flooded with drones spamming CoRraLatiON nOt EQuAl CaUsaTioN.
It's like when you only dare to say you think you're somewhat sure of yourself on a matter and people say "uhm sweetheart dunning krüger much?????" With no elaboration whatsoever.
Is it a reddit argument at this point where people don't really think about it and just say it or is it a made up weaponized way of deplatforming any anti authority research?
This lil nigga is a psyop isn't it? This argument is brought up against every single questionable and sketchy research that might endanger authority.
It can be said about almost every research on any topic if the results aren't as clear as daylight where people are only saying "hmm there could be a causation" but instantly the discussion gets flooded with drones spamming CoRraLatiON nOt EQuAl CaUsaTioN.
It's like when you only dare to say you think you're somewhat sure of yourself on a matter and people say "uhm sweetheart dunning krüger much?????" With no elaboration whatsoever.
Is it a reddit argument at this point where people don't really think about it and just say it or is it a made up weaponized way of deplatforming any anti authority research?
