>>13582112His ideas are much more oriented towards the world actually being some kind of data system, as in a literal controlled simulation we are not aware of. Thomas Metzinger tends to stay away from this level, similar ideas in execution but more obscured in their origins. As for Wolfram, he might have some thoughts on this but his theory is more scientific in nature as he does not dwell into the inner workings of the brain from a computational perspective. For him it is more about the universe as a computational system. His approach is actually scientific in how he approaches it and rarely does he talk about specifics with poor reasoning.
Joscha Bach is an extremist with respect to both, he is so far down the rabbit hole he makes up stories about everything happening in the brain which he has no basis for.
