Targeted individuals have been discussing directed energy weapons years prior to the now well-known Havana syndrome attacks against U.S. diplomats and federal agents but have so far been unable to produce scientifically verifiable evidence of these alleged attacks. This guy appears to be one of the first to have succeeded in some degree at producing that evidence.
>For that analysis, I rented the Narda NBM 550; it is an industrial-strength, wideband radiofrequency measurement device (that retails at $30,000-$40,000 with probes). Over a period of a month I kept careful measurements of the frequency I was exposed to using the NBM 550.
>What I found is that I was routinely exposed to frequency 1000x problematic EMF levels. It was not uncommon that I saw readings of 400 mW/m2 and higher. Patrick van der Burght (an authority on radiation assessment in homes) describes here that a 0.01 mW/m2 RF reading as ideal in the home and a 0.3 mW/m2 reading as potentially problematic possibly requiring shielding. The 400 mW/m2 levels I was exposed to are more than1000x this frequency level.
>The FCC uses a higher standard for determining ‘acceptable levels’. The FCC puts out guidelines on maximum exposure of frequency (“Limits for Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) — from §1.1310”). According to their guidelines, the maximum exposure for frequencies between 1.5 GHz and 100 GHz is 5 mW/m2. Even by this standard, the frequency levels I’m seeing are 40–80x the maximum permissible levels.
>https://jay-coins.medium.com/scientific-evidence-of-dew-targeting-80746d875416
So is this guy being attacked with directed energy weapons? He could have followed his initial experiments up with a control group or even an attempt at locating the transmitter with a directional antenna, but so far this is the most compelling evidence I've seen. What do you think, /sci/?
>For that analysis, I rented the Narda NBM 550; it is an industrial-strength, wideband radiofrequency measurement device (that retails at $30,000-$40,000 with probes). Over a period of a month I kept careful measurements of the frequency I was exposed to using the NBM 550.
>What I found is that I was routinely exposed to frequency 1000x problematic EMF levels. It was not uncommon that I saw readings of 400 mW/m2 and higher. Patrick van der Burght (an authority on radiation assessment in homes) describes here that a 0.01 mW/m2 RF reading as ideal in the home and a 0.3 mW/m2 reading as potentially problematic possibly requiring shielding. The 400 mW/m2 levels I was exposed to are more than1000x this frequency level.
>The FCC uses a higher standard for determining ‘acceptable levels’. The FCC puts out guidelines on maximum exposure of frequency (“Limits for Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) — from §1.1310”). According to their guidelines, the maximum exposure for frequencies between 1.5 GHz and 100 GHz is 5 mW/m2. Even by this standard, the frequency levels I’m seeing are 40–80x the maximum permissible levels.
>https://jay-coins.medium.com/scientific-evidence-of-dew-targeting-80746d875416
So is this guy being attacked with directed energy weapons? He could have followed his initial experiments up with a control group or even an attempt at locating the transmitter with a directional antenna, but so far this is the most compelling evidence I've seen. What do you think, /sci/?
