>>13572523You can look up the video named "Learn Mathematics from START
to FINISH". For you, till Linear Algebra is relevant, after that, the math
required should be included in Physics books you are following.
Before you start Calculus and Linear Algebra, I would suggest
watching 3b1b videos on those to get a head start for what you are
getting into. Once you are done with those two, I would suggest
Hubbard's book on Linear Algebra and Calculus as a way to unify
those branches, though it's not required.
You can skip the foundational logic part and perhaps even set theory
since they mostly deal with rigour rather than applied math, but I do
not suggest that. Here's the thing with learning physics, especially if
you want to be a researcher which you should since you aren't getting
any other job as a Physics major it is pretty much equivalent to learning
math.
If you aren't interested in math, you could skip a lot of the foundational
rigour, but you will have trouble with higher level math which will be
required later on in physics, and maybe even in Linear Algebra, which
is the most important branch of Mathematics for all things Physics.
Enderton's books are really good for rigorous logic and set theory,
though contrary to what "foundational" may imply, with the exception of
basic logic and set theory, you should study these alongside higher math
and physics, they are just a way to test your mathematical rigour. If you
wish to be a researcher who wants to make up their own theorems, you
need good rigour.
The
https://math-atlas.org/ site provides some suggestions for every
math branch. Very good site if you develop an interest in math.