>>13580927The only reason that the average individual affords a degree of liberty and well being never before seen in human history is because of individual rights, with which meritocracy and free market can come into effect with minimalized harm.
Individual rights have been championed by movements on the left and the right since the enlightenment. Only authoritarians that believe in the supremacy of their world view, think that you should be able to tamper with the individuals right to free choice, for some "greater good", at his expense.
Most /pol/niggers use the Bell curve as some sort of evidence that miscegenation laws should be enforced (which infringes on an individual's right to choose who to love), or that non-white ethnicities should be second class citizens (a complete attack on the notion that shared humanity is what gives us rights, and that no man has any reason to have any more than another) or ethnically cleansed.
Yes, nigs get welfare, I get it, I don't think that racist policies in favour of the "losing race" are any better than racist policies in favour of the "winners". Maybe the average whites is "superior" in various important aspects, but why should the dumbest white ever have more more rights than the smartest black? Why not just let darwinism and meritocracy decide, and let the race be as fair as it can be?
>inb4 I'm not a /pol/tardAnon, we are on the world's biggest hub for neonazis and facists, forgive me if I'm wrong one tenth of the time. And just to show you, this post, which is in no way insensible, and would probably seem as entirely rational by 90% of thinkers from the enlightenment and after, will probably be bombarbed with Basedjaks and memes, the retort of the mentally stunted manchild.
