>>13572811>The skies were like this for about 50 daysYeah, you just pulled that out of your ass, and once again you're posting an image not taken close to the solar noon. You also don't understand that smoke is like a layer of clouds and that an orange tint isn't indicative of no light getting through, which would be obvious if you weren't retarded.
>"Close enough to 100%" doesn't cut it. It does when there are other energy sources besides solar and onshore wind, or you could just extend the energy storage beyond the mere 12 hours or the generation beyond 150% overcapacity.
> You're talking about blackouts on a nearly daily basis somewhere on the gridPlease learn how to interpret a simple graph, the vast majority of the year showed no blackouts in this analysis.
