>>13569089>what does your facial structure have to do with any of that?The way I understand your chart, "enemies" are faces that signal threat or seem dangerous to women. They are attracted to them. The explanation to why is evolutionary.
>this is actually hyper cucked and bluepilled.lol, angry jawlet detected
>this is what simps like to say to justify mlady's hypergamyNope, on the contrary, if your woman threatens to cheat on you, it means you are not dominating her and you are not a threat to her. The way to keep a woman is to make her feel you could be two seconds away from beating the shit out of her.
>"b-but its for the good of the human race!"Evolution is neither good or bad, it is what it is.
>is fucking steppeniggers and ignorant savages bettering our lives in any way? They are fucking your women. Wasn't this the thread topic? It isn't good for humanity. I never said it was.
It is what it is. Women like danger.
The answer is to stop being so beta.
>why don't civilisation builders like newton and tesla get pussy?Because evolution isn't necessarily geared towards civilization building. Ants are the most succesful animals on Earth after all, not Humans.
It is what it is. You are looking to asign purpose and meaning where there is none.
