>>13567245It isn't my mindset that is preventing you from understanding the problem, it's your inability to be objective and understand that there are consequences to a proposal. You cannot argue, and continue to insist, that it is "not possible to say 'we'" when I've already demonstrated otherwise.
Also, it seems like you haven't read the proposal to which you're responding at all, if you're responding to it so specifically. You literally haven't read it or anything but you're able to tell me that it won't work because of a pronoun because you haven't read it. That is infantile.
>Also, you apparently literally haven't heard of the concept of a collective action problemAnd now you're arguing about it because I explained how you're missing the point of my argument? I should just Google "Collective action problem" so you could stop trying to explain yourself to me and to yourself? I may be wrong in my thinking, and if I am I'll understand it and I'll improve in that respect. But you don't know me, you don't understand me, and you don't understand what I've read or how I think. You literally haven't been anywhere near where I've been in terms of what I know or understand.
