>>13563081No, I was trying to help and understand what you were asking because you admittedly were originally vague and even said OP was poorly worded, then you started attacking me and calling me names while continually failing to verbalize any kind of point or real direction for this thread, so I felt compelled to tell you exactly how incoherent and shitty your original image is and how vague and pointless your original question is.
Even you don't understand why OP is color graded, how exactly it is suppose to be a map of math, how you can measure its accuracy (accurate at what?), how it is relevant to anything other than the general idea of some arbitrary math language, or what you would want from an image that is relevant, accurate, or complete.
