>>13561228I'm not sure how exactly this data was obtained, but let's assume it was self reported and each woman gave their preferences from A-E.
Adding on to
>>13561238, each woman is likely determining what their preference is based on only their experiences, and it's likely each woman is basing their preference only relatively on maybe 2 or 3 dicks at most on average.
Example:
Women X may think that since her experience with a 7-incher felt great, 6 inches must be too small and 8 inches must be too big, even if she never experienced either. Not to mention anything lower like 5-inchers or bigger like 9-inchers.
Considering that less than 5% of the population has an 11-incher (very, very generous estimation), how can they possibly know that it would be enjoyable?
The only way you are going to get reliable data is by asking women that have had at least one dick for every letter (A-ideal, B-very satisfying, and so on), preferably you'd only ask women that have had at least one dick for every single inch.
