>>13561950>arguing that everyone else has had the same negative experienceThis is you creating delusions to justify defending an industry that is objectively corrupt. I never said they do more harm than good, I never said they do no good. Maybe if you had moral stance you wouldn't resort to hallucinating things that were never said.
>maybe if you had stuck with them, you'd find some peace.I highly doubt being more dizzy, sleeping 14+hrs, having more intense sexual dysfunction would have made me happier. But as I said, you aren't operating out of a concern for other's well-being, only out of defending a morally bankrupt industry.
>Today there exists far more treatments for mental illness than there did 50 years ago. That's a fact, not an opinion. How can you not call that progress? You are saying medicine is purely capitalistic because more=good. It doesn't matter if effective treatments have been suppressed for ages or not for the sake of profits, progress is solely determined by the number of compounds available. It's reducing science to the maxim of consumerism.
> More people being mentally ill is a reflection of our society, not the fucking pharmaceutical industrial.You cannot claim that the pharmaceutical industry isn't connected to our society. In the same post you are saying mental illness is a result of society and that the way to fix it is with drugs, rather than addressing the deeper issues. Absurd.
> What do you say to >>13561703, was it just lucky coincidence that someone got helped by psychiatry?What do you say to all of the people that commit suicide due to meds, or suffer long-term problems due to them? Just coincidence? Of course it wasn't.
I never once argued the medications cannot help SOME people. I did claim they are made more for profit than for actually helping people. Because there are other ways to help many people that don't carry the same risks, but they aren't under a monopoly of sociopaths.
