>>13551348OP's post is forwarding the tweet. The tweets original point was how misleading the results are presented by the 'ACADEMICS', hence "DONT QUESTION ACADEMICS" (sarcasm, OP is actually saying the academics where being questionable) if you where sorry enough to not have understood that.
>studies that do measure rates of pedophilia still don't support the lie that gay people are more likely to be pedophiles.Cope, ratio of gay pedophiles to gay people, is much bigger then the ratio of hetero pedophiles to hetero people. Just doing the napkin math, The majority of child molers are male (88%m 9%f remainder unknown). however victims are 33% and 66% female. Those numbers ain't adding up, now are they Tony?
>I don't know why those people are acting like it's some sort of win anywaysThe main point is academics obfuscate the truth. The gay, pedophile thing is just a germane example, given how inherently political and - touchy - the topic is, meaning a lot of people would be motivated to obscure the truth.
