>>13561579I don't really know how to approach this. I was relaxed and laid back up until the moment I came to this site 2yrs ago. I slowly became obsessed with aptitude-centric viewpoints. Genetic determinism, evopsych, eugenics, aka science-based demoralizing concepts that gave birth to inceldom and the black pill viewpoints which are slowly destroying me.
I started checking my place in these hierarchies (IQ, attraction, aptitude, etc) and I realized that I am average.
I tested my IQ 4 times:
>(Verbal) IQ test by a clinical psychologist for driver's license: 97. (it was like an interview, no paperwork or matrices were involved).>Norway Mensa Online IQ test: 97 IQ.>OpenPsychometrics IQ test (the one with letters that form words and a 2D grid with dots on it): 97 IQ.>Some random online IQ test a shit ton of questions: 97 IQ.Do I believe that I need to be literal Chad (7 ft, rich, smart) to live a good life? Yeah I do now, because of this website.
What keeps me on the fence is that I come across several friend groups whose members vary from being short, weak, ugly to tall, strong and chad, and the "incel" looking ones are just as happy as the chad looking ones. It's like these concepts don't exist up until the moment you believe in them.
But then I see intellectuals/academics like Jordan Peterson (+google results) making demoralizing statements like people with IQ less than 100 are doomed, society is going to collapse, etc.
I got accepted into Pharmacy school with an IQ of 97 but Google says I need an IQ of ~120-125 to get into it. In a nutshell, I am just on the peripheries of considering myself an incel. Scientific literature says that I should be an incel, but the outside world isn't as harsh as words on the internet portray it to be. I don't understand what is going on.
You asked me to elaborate in a patronizing way that infers you have debunked inceldom and the IQ-centric viewpoints. What's your argument? What's your advice for me?
