>>13544305>the evolution from ape to human is characterized with juvenilization of the skull to allow for more brain volumeSimultaneously, the ongoing juvenilization has resulted in a significant loss of brain mass during the last 10 thousand years. So, while you're correct about the ape part, you're incorrect about the ongoing current process. Neoteny in animal is robustly linked to domestication (wolf vs dog, boar vs pig etc.) and domestication is linked to lowered brain volume. This is my argument here.
>of course too much neoteny results in diminishing returns such as infertility and weaknessFemales mimicking extraordinarily strong child features don't necessarily have to be infertile. I don't see the connection here.
>this is why males that have very low neotenous faces (very strong browridge, a bump on the top of the head, underbite, "apelike", etc ) are considered ugly.You're overstretching the idea here. At some point, certain other constraints or consequences of evolutionary biology kick in. Here, the desire of an individual to find another genetically similar individual in order to get genetically similar off-spring. Your presented specimen however would be too different from the average individual making him a siginificantly less attractive object for females due to the aforementioned effect.
>it will seem that all females want a troglodyte looking giga chad double their height and men want a 6 years old loliAgain, you overstretch the idea here.
It can be rather easily shown that Females want a man that is bigger than they themselves are, that this preference is nearly universal leading to sexual dimorphism that can be observed in any ape. For obvious reasons. He should also be capable of fending for himself which implies a preference for average to above-average strength relative to the male average.
