>>13542593>but you didnt measureIt's a hypothetical used to illustrate the argument, just as you didn't spend a year predicting the results of a roulette wheel.
I didn't say the materialist's conclusion is based off measurements.
I said the materialist's argument is that, *if* we were able to measure all the variables, we would conclusively be able to predict the outcome every single time.
>override on autonomy "freedom"What "freedom?" What evidence do you have for this "freedom?"
There is evidence against the existence of free will, namely the fact that the brain is a collection of atoms, and atoms are wholly subject to cause and effect, as
>>13542210 already described.
We know conclusively that the material world affects the mind. Conversely, we have no evidence of the immaterial affecting the mind.
These points does not disprove free will, but are evidence against it.
