>>13543041>Is /sci this ignorant?ad hominen
>Anyone who has a basic understanding of immunology and virology has the capacity to understand that the WHO and CDC have been contradicting science since day oneanother baseless generalization (a mix of anectodality and argumentum ad populum) which can be falsified by the fact that many doctors still believe in the CDC course of action
>an unprecedented 'lockdown' approachlockdowns to control pandemics are not unprecedented
>mass vaccinate the world population DURING a pandemic- too late- which simply breeds escape mutant 'superviruses'yes, it does, but empirical evidence shows that it is good at lowering infection rates and hospitalizations (you can see this correlation in the data)
>literally artificially selected to evade the immunity conferred by the narrow anti-spike protein vaccines we are administering. Such antigenic shift causing immune escape is seen with the delta variant of sars-cov2, for instance; and it will continue in this fashion.yes, it will, because vaccinating everyone at the same time was impossible. But this virus is not like HIV or HCV (which mutate too fast to create a vaccine) and the early vaccines still have a degree of protection against new variants and lower the viral charge. this means that we're going faster than the virus mutation rate, in some years the virus can be eradicated, of course with booster shots for the new variants to keep the pace.
>This is a serial passage experiment performed on Humanity.I don't understand what you mean
>The most educated individuals (PhDs) are the most covid vaccine hesitant.this is another generalization, can you demonstrate this claim? and if you indeed some good empirical evidence, can you really show that it is not geographically limitated (that would be I think a Texas sharpshooter fallacy)
