>my entire epistemological groundwork was made by stealing the Neopositivists' idea but I will claim in my autobiography that I already created my system
>inductive reasoning is wrong because...ehm...because of this retarded heckin funny turkeyrino joke
>I made the great discovery that metaphysical bullshit which cannot be proven also, woozer, cannot be proven false, this is my principle of falsifiability. forget that this was obvious to every inductivist before me, I'm gonna pretend I discovered it and you will follow my deductive model.
>what? every scientist has always been an inductivist...wait...that doesn't count because...ehm...because they were actually deductivist...trust me bro.
>my entire critique to inductivists and verificationists is that you cannot reach certain conclusions ("problem" which was known to every scientist) that's why you will follow my model of falsifiability which still cannot ascertain conclusions because it would need infinite potential falsificators since every falsification can be falsified too, if you point out that this is the greatest tautology ever said well...think of the heckin turkeyrino and shut up ok, we actually need some degree of dogmatism, ok, sweetie?
>metaphysics is not useless garbage but it actually leads science because...ehm...because it just does ok?
>I'm a retarded faggot who didn't understand darwinism so I will claim that it is not scientific but metaphysical, then, despite having the knowledge of a middle-schooler in biology, I will have the nerve to make my own version of "Darwinism" which is teleological and thus contradicts the very essence of natural selection
>marxism and historicism are wrong but my moral values and ideas are right because...ehm...because they are, and my idea of society is a living self-contradiction
>inductive reasoning is wrong because...ehm...because of this retarded heckin funny turkeyrino joke
>I made the great discovery that metaphysical bullshit which cannot be proven also, woozer, cannot be proven false, this is my principle of falsifiability. forget that this was obvious to every inductivist before me, I'm gonna pretend I discovered it and you will follow my deductive model.
>what? every scientist has always been an inductivist...wait...that doesn't count because...ehm...because they were actually deductivist...trust me bro.
>my entire critique to inductivists and verificationists is that you cannot reach certain conclusions ("problem" which was known to every scientist) that's why you will follow my model of falsifiability which still cannot ascertain conclusions because it would need infinite potential falsificators since every falsification can be falsified too, if you point out that this is the greatest tautology ever said well...think of the heckin turkeyrino and shut up ok, we actually need some degree of dogmatism, ok, sweetie?
>metaphysics is not useless garbage but it actually leads science because...ehm...because it just does ok?
>I'm a retarded faggot who didn't understand darwinism so I will claim that it is not scientific but metaphysical, then, despite having the knowledge of a middle-schooler in biology, I will have the nerve to make my own version of "Darwinism" which is teleological and thus contradicts the very essence of natural selection
>marxism and historicism are wrong but my moral values and ideas are right because...ehm...because they are, and my idea of society is a living self-contradiction
