Further Elucidation of Organic Bose-Einstein Condensate Theory, Potential Explanation for Temporal Dislocation of OBECs Over Time
Back in June, I hypothesized the communication between two human subjects via neural OBEC linkage was a likely mechanism (one of two known mechanisms) for the transference of information from the future into the past. However, the exact structure of the OBECs and the mechanism through which they become temporally disjointed in the first place eluded me.
Passage through time is dependent upon mass. Objects with positive mass move forward in time, but objects with negative mass move backward. While we have established that mass can be inverted temporarily in the case of things like neutrinos, for Einstein-Rosen bridges to exist, entanglement between two atoms must be created, and for temporally disjointed bridges to exist, they must be disjointed. I considered the possibility that the entanglement could happen from a temporally remote point i.e. due to the emission of tachyons from the future toward the past, but have since dismissed this as highly implausible, given that tachyonic information is always precisely inverted in terms of its sequence of transmission.
Therefore, I pursued the hypothesis that entanglement must have its origins only at points where molecules are in perfect synchronization temporally and that this temporal separation must accumulate slowly over time, subsequent to the initial entanglement. The question then becomes, how does molecule B (the molecule in the "future") come to travel forward in time at a higher rate of speed than molecule A?
Back in June, I hypothesized the communication between two human subjects via neural OBEC linkage was a likely mechanism (one of two known mechanisms) for the transference of information from the future into the past. However, the exact structure of the OBECs and the mechanism through which they become temporally disjointed in the first place eluded me.
Passage through time is dependent upon mass. Objects with positive mass move forward in time, but objects with negative mass move backward. While we have established that mass can be inverted temporarily in the case of things like neutrinos, for Einstein-Rosen bridges to exist, entanglement between two atoms must be created, and for temporally disjointed bridges to exist, they must be disjointed. I considered the possibility that the entanglement could happen from a temporally remote point i.e. due to the emission of tachyons from the future toward the past, but have since dismissed this as highly implausible, given that tachyonic information is always precisely inverted in terms of its sequence of transmission.
Therefore, I pursued the hypothesis that entanglement must have its origins only at points where molecules are in perfect synchronization temporally and that this temporal separation must accumulate slowly over time, subsequent to the initial entanglement. The question then becomes, how does molecule B (the molecule in the "future") come to travel forward in time at a higher rate of speed than molecule A?
