>>13537310>wrong that is only for the pharmaceutical companiesNO SHIT. THE ONES MAKING THE FUCKING VACCINE IN THE FIRST PLACE YOU RETARD. The "foundation" of the fucking problem, yes. You cannot sue them nor are they accountable for all the problems being caused by the vaccines.
>A corporation is not a man it is an entirely different jurisdiction>they only do this because groupthinks play the "pass the blame" game when it comes to responsibility. "Yes". That's how they are going to get away scot free with it. Just like those banks in Europe deemed too big to fail. "Well it's run by Jews but it's not a jew itself", wow what a convincing argument.
>You can sue any medical professional for bad medical advice that results in injury. A no win scenario where:
1.I can "sue" some doctor where it will be found out that he indeed did his job 100% correct. He administered the vaccine I wanted the same way others had it. Which won't hold up in court because "he did his job right and book learned retards love accurate descriptions because they can't explain anything". According to the law, he did nothing wrong and I'm prone to agree. How was he supposed to know the vaccines he's used to administering being sourced from the standard sources would contain toxic ineffective garbage? He didn't develop it himself.
2. I can't sue the pharmaceutical company for making a shit vaccine that resulted in injury because the courts arbitrarily deemed them too worthy to fail because of no data and....popularity I guess.
But I'm sure you're so smart and have a real world example ready to post of someone suing a doctor over a corana-19 vaccine in court right?
>Stop larping like you know what you are talking aboutStop making posts of no use and pretending its a revelation. As if I didn't know a doctor could be sued, it's the main reason why they have insurance and cost a fortune in the first place you retard.
