>>13532651Rigor. Let's apply your reasoning to the standard model of particle physics
>Why should we include the masses of the neutrinos when we don't even know them?>We only know relative masses, and most calculations just treat neutrinos as massless anyway>Why should we add this in, when it'll create waste?By the way, this stuff is mostly digital now. You're also aware all those old periodic tables, even the ones posted on university classrooms, don't have all the discovered super heavy elements, right? So why should we add such super heavy elements anyway? What utility do they serve? 99.999% of chemical reactions used in practical chemistry don't use super heavy elements anyway. And if we add them in, we could potentially waste all these older periodic tables. What's the point?
