>>13529948>that article conflates whiteness with what people were allowed to do (which was mostly restricted for Blacks)That article is trying to determine whether people considered Irish etc. to be white or not. And since there is no polling from that era it has to infer the views of people from their behavior. We know how they treated someone who definitely was considered non-white (blacks) and compare whether they treated others the same. And it turns out they did not.
>is just more sociology faggotry.No, that's just history.
Since you have such a thoughtful rebuttals to my arguments I wonder your evidence is for Irish not being white.
Let me guess, it is a mean quote from someone calling Irish negroes and some Harper's Weekly drawing, right?
