>>13524461Cravings is one thing. When they get dead victim witness sketches it is a whole different thing. I have to read into it further just to see its validity before I try introducing it into my own comprehension.
If sensations drive memory you can basically neck the whole organ thing all together and plug people into a machine for remote viewing of any event, even ones that haven't happened or haven't happened, yet. The latter being hallucinations or minority report shit. If the "transmission" is not nervous, but is communicated in blood then every statement ever said about the brain and memory is outright fabrication. Are there any other channels I am missing? I guess some voodoo shit of body parts anchoring a soul, but mixing souls just about invalidates every premise for a soul in the first place.
Maybe imbuing, some kind of write forward process with feedback. Supposing nerves in organs can see as plainly as those in eyes lends to the holographic model for brains. This shit is really whacky, but not all of the sources look great at first glance. It is worth knowing the extent of it though so I will dig in.
