>>13521477>you left out the part where the changed the definition of herd immunity and where they admitted to intentionally lying about masks multiple timesThat's sort of what I meant! The masks was because they wanted all of them first so they could properly apply their book learned education on you. How nice of them.
>>13521824>Wow it's almost as if the definition depends on the rate of virus mutation and transmission>When a virus does the same thing at a different rate, the definition of something else must change?Wow, who knew that when it's a medical groupthink instead of a political groupthink, logomachy, semantics, contradictions and illogically changing definitions on a dime is now acceptable. If I ever wanted to become a conniving evil person who wanted to extort millions of people, I think I know which side I would join so that no one would ever become wise to my schemes.
The herds immune systems still exists and still adapts. It doesn't care what words or semantics you argue, your definition doesn't just change reality. You're breeding a spiting image of self-contradictory retards with your new normal garbage of lying and changing definitions to cover up for lies you told in the past, just like any tyrannical dictatorship would. But at least you have your petty descriptions of what you never logically explained in the first place. What could go wrong?
>>13522066>If you don't think there is a difference between herd immunity acquired from infection vs. vaccine, why don't you go and inject yourself with live ebola.Explain the difference. Both are the virus, and you can acquire herd immunity from both. The only difference is that with one way you have to go through a bunch of bureaucratic morons who believe complicating the evolution of a virus is actually a good thing rather than just becoming immune over the non altered one.
>>13522673So don't trust WHO? Or CDC? I'm gonna wager both given that both can't get their stories straight.
