>>13520177He said the argument is unsound, because he thinks one of the premises is incorrect. But that the argument is valid, in that if the premise was correct, the argument would not contain any contradictions or errors.
>>13516878 (OP)Personally I dislike the american money hierarchy because it rewards an individual based on their ability to generate profit for a company, and the bargaining power of employer versus employee.
This means that meaningless work that produces a large amount of profit is rewarded greatly. For example, engineering facebook to be 1% more engaging, increases profits by millions or billions of dollars. So people get paid a lot of money to make facebook waste their users time.
Whereas a person who does something useful, but not immediately/obviously profitable gets ripped off. For example, a lot of scientific research isn't immediately profitable, but is actually valuable (for example, in terms of utility)
