>>13516478>No, you wouldn't be frozenmost if not all parts of earth are cold enough to "freeze life to death" compared to the warmth of geysers if we're talking about life that is adapted to living in geysers
>hit by hard X rays xrays penetrate the atmosphere.
>early life probably wasn't really alivethen it probably wasn't life huh?
>>13520099>Those organism where pressured out of those placesMeaningless statement. A more exploitable environment somewhere else does not mean a species is "pressured" to accelerate the 100% random mutations that would be necessary to exit its current environment and a collapsing current environment does not accelerate the 100% random mutations that would be necessary to survive outside its current environment. Hence, nothing is "pressuing" anything to change. A species either got lucky with these completely random mutations or it didn't.
A "pressure" can only keep what is already there. Humans historically have been pressured to keep 20/20 vision for instance. If your genes lose that odds are nature will pressure your genes out of existence. It doesn't pressure something new into existence.
>Theres literally no point ing going into the voidMutations are not concerned with "points"
Panspermia is considered a beneficial trait. If it was possible to adapt the trait of panspermia (many people think it is) then you should expect it to eventually happen. Tardigrades could spread throughout the whole universe on a long enough timeframe if they could survive deep space for instance.
>Theres bacteria that resists the outer space conditions though, so theres thatYou've basically contradicted yourself by acknowledging this. If you think there is no point in going out into the void then how could bacteria be "pressured" into developing that trait?
