>>13499936I can tell you for a fact that Langan can't do this, therefore, his theory is worthless.
>inb4 you're a brainlet.Even the most advanced physics could be explained in a few sentences by someone like Richard Feynman. Someone who btw, only had an IQ of 125, not the ridiculously untestable number of 200, that Langan and others claim.
If Langan is really so intelligent, and his theory rigorously defined, then he should be able to explian the gist of it to a high schooler.
