/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #13496987

448KiB, 1600x900, phenomenologynow.png

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

brainlet alert brainlet alert

Anonymous Tue 10 Aug 01:03:13 2021 No.13496987 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By:

you fuckers will never be able to understand the significance of 20th century phenomenology with your paul churchland quasi-cartesian pseudo bullshit

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 10 Aug 2021 01:42:21 No.13497148 Report

Quoted By: >>13497189 >>13497192

Every time I see something that could've been expressed in simpler language but was not (a lot of Continental philosophy), I become suspicious.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 10 Aug 2021 01:53:28 No.13497189 Report

Quoted By: >>13497207

>>13497148
just reject it outright, something thats unnecessarily lengthy was written by someone who was too dumb to exert the self control necessary to avoid the excess.
imagine being brainlet enough to think wordiness equals sophistication, can a person like that write anything worth reading?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 10 Aug 2021 01:53:53 No.13497192 Report

Quoted By: >>13497461

>>13497148

give me an example of a passage that bothers you in that way

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 10 Aug 2021 01:56:26 No.13497207 Report

Quoted By: >>13497471

>>13497189
do you go through the process of mentally translating in your own words, analyzing your paraphrase versus the original passage, and knowing for sure that both versions are actually semantically identical before you reject what you're reading for excessive wording? or are you intellectually lazy?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 10 Aug 2021 02:55:23 No.13497461 Report

Quoted By: >>13497550

>>13497192
I can't be bothered fetching particular passages, but surely you see a difference between the writing of guys like Hume, Locke, and Berkeley on the one hand and guys like Kant, Hegel, and Heidegger on the other.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 10 Aug 2021 02:57:04 No.13497471 Report

Quoted By:

>>13497207
>are you intellectually lazy?
are you intellectually compensating?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 10 Aug 2021 03:23:29 No.13497550 Report

Quoted By:

>>13497461
Yup. It's almost as if those two groups were talking about very different things. Also, I'll give it to you that Heidegger and Hegel come across as esoteric, but Kant is actually an extremely cogent writer in the logical sense. His reasoning is just dense and embedded with tons of subsidiary conclusions that add complexity, but his writing was very traditionally rational for the time.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches