>>13496026You did not, as global warming is not taking place. And even if it were, the recommendations are both morally reprehensible and practically untenable, so that the question of whether global warming is in fact taking place is immaterial to what ought to be done.
Let me be perfectly clear. Suppose that it's happening, which it isnt. It is preferable that the planet warm up a good five to ten degrees or so (I don't care which scale) and trigger a mass extinction, taking lots of brown people and some white people along with it, than that we alter course. That is how nature will balance her books. And then, only through the force of nature itself, and not through any intelligent human effort, we will arrive at the simplest and most obvious solution. The solution weakly tried by the Chinese before they abandoned it, the solution correctly prescribed by the Georgia Guidestones: reduce the human population. No one wants to talk about this one because Muh Human Rights, Muh Biological Imperative To Reproduce, Muh Racism. So nature must simply run its course, and without any possibility for human discourse to rationally govern itself on this, because humanity itself is governed by the irrational impulse to reproduce.
You lose in every way that it is possible to lose. You are first of all wrong, but even if you're right, you're still wrong, or irrelevant. Cars will continue to be driven, Plastics will continue to be manufactured, and vaccines will continue to be developed. And who drives this madness? Cuck scientists and engineers, who never pause to ask the real, metaphysical questions, the Shoulda.
You added a footnote to a sham kike paper. Congratulations on your "contribution".
