>>13492389Depends on the situation, and also you probably never genuinely have no information to go off of. Doing nothing tends to be what people think of as the right decision with little information to go off of for example in part because of an implicit understanding that more situations than not are similar to most every other day in recent history, and that being the case it'd be a better bet that leaving things alone and proceeding as usual would work out vs. trying something new and introducing a problem where there was none before.
Basically falls under the generalized version of the Copernican principle (i.e. the mediocrity principle) where it's best to assume any given event will be typical / average rather than unusual / extreme, simply because, by definition, there are many more mediocre cases than there are special cases.
