>>13474946>If you enable malevolence while being perfectly capable of stopping it, then you must wish harm or misfortune on othersWhat if you enable it but don't wish harm or misfortune on others? You just don't do anything. Doesn't seem evil to me.
>>13474963Partly, because you made actions that helped Tim murder you. But we're talking about remaining neutral here. If you didn't drive Tim to your house, if you told Tim that murder is wrong and he should love his neighbor, and he still chooses to kill someone I don't think it makes you evil or responsible for what he did. And crucially, this also holds if you knew he was likely to kill that someone and you could for example go to his house and beat him up to prevent it but you don't. In the same spirit, I don't think it's evil for me not to donate all my money to starving children in africa. It's their problem, not mine.
