>>13451024>God is real and so it this other thing I think might be real.>>13451554Scientific materialism, yes. Science in the sense of natural philosophy is still necissarily compatible with God, the supreme principle of existence. We've merely changed around the symbols.
>>13451624Do you believe they emerge from something?
>>13451629>Science doesn't presumeThe presupposition of a classical ontology. Why not a process ontology? We observe God necissarily entering all temporal occasions, and participating in evolution of the world by offering possibilities. You can all that philosophy - it is process philosophy. But it is a suitable alternative to scientific materialism, and a remedy for the bifurcation of nature.
>>13451655Because the supernatural is apparently impossible in my ontology; everything is found in nature.
>>13451665Illumination is woo, light is photons.
