>>13433463>>13433464>>13433198>straw manMore like an application of hyperbole on a generalization of already exaggerated claims (link to one such claim:
https://youtu.be/oHk8nn0nw18) claims for the purpose of a joke and not an argument you autistic pseud.
>cry moreI'm not the one who's crying, the kids are (picrel) and it's all because of (You). baka.
>has nothing to do with CO2It was an off hand example of some lame environmental policy that's annoying and ineffective, I could have come up with a better one but I didn't.
>wow make oil cheaper so we can burn more and emit EVEN MORE CO2 you're a genius!So instead of taxing that cheap oil you want to waste our already limited supply transporting more oil? makes sense. I have an even better solution though, why don't we just decrease the demand of oil by organizing ourselves more efficiently? We could embrace the solutions I already outlined thus far and even some I haven't (e.g. reducing or abolishing zoning)
>oh just let china take over our shipping that'll really reduce emissions!China wouldn't dominate our fucking ports, rivers, and canals retard. Besides, this protectionist bullshit doesn't even address the point I was making about climate change.
>Green new deal actually has a whole lot of fantastic infrastructure proposals, we mainly just need to tax and tariff the shit out of emissions and the market will self correct practically overnight.You are retarded. Accumulating a larger national debt and crippling our economy is not a fantastic anything proposal.
