>>13434668>"I can't form a coherent argument, so I'll just dismiss it.">"Well you're still a poopiehead!"Your argument boils down to "novel = bad," and that
>most of nature exists for a long time and it worksIt is elementary to see that everything in the world as we know it, biologically and otherwise, was at one point "new." Because nature has proven to take novel approaches, your argument against the idea of "unnatural," as presented, is contradictory.
