>"other than initiating the fires in WTC 7, the damage from the debris from WTC 1 had little effect on initiating the collapse of WTC 7."
>"the building withstood fires involving typical office combustibles on several floors"
>"even without the structural damage, WTC 7 would have collapsed from fires having the same characteristics as those experienced on September 11, 2001."
If these kinds of buildings are subject to progressive failure then they are unsafe and uninhabitable. Building 7 is a common design; how many buildings like this are there and how dangerous are they? The U.S. government's investigators acknowledge that there was a progressive failure in each of the three buildings but don't seem concerned about it even though no other buildings have ever collapsed in a progressive way except during demolition.
This is the disconnect that raises at least my suspicions that there is something they are not telling us.
>"the building withstood fires involving typical office combustibles on several floors"
>"even without the structural damage, WTC 7 would have collapsed from fires having the same characteristics as those experienced on September 11, 2001."
If these kinds of buildings are subject to progressive failure then they are unsafe and uninhabitable. Building 7 is a common design; how many buildings like this are there and how dangerous are they? The U.S. government's investigators acknowledge that there was a progressive failure in each of the three buildings but don't seem concerned about it even though no other buildings have ever collapsed in a progressive way except during demolition.
This is the disconnect that raises at least my suspicions that there is something they are not telling us.
