The paradox of "and"

No.13419429 ViewReplyOriginalReport
The word "and" actually has 2 completely different meanings in everyday language. Think about the following for example:

A: "I eat an apple and I eat a pear"
B: "I eat an apple and a pear"

Although the 2 statements mean the same thing, the meaning of "and" is very different:
In A, "and" is equivalent to its usage in classical logic.
In B instead, "and" is roughly a shortcut for: "the same is also true for...".
If "and" in B had the same meaning it has in A, the statement would mean something like:

"I eat an applepear"

Does anyone know any language that makes this distinction clear (for example using 2 distinct words)?