>>13411040OP's image cites a number of VAERS reported deaths at over 10,000. I checked the VAERS data, and there are approximately 10,000-11,000 reports. Not all of them were deaths. Ergo, the OP image is one founded on ignorance or nefariously lying.
https://digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/publication/r18hs017045-lazarus-final-report-2011.pdfNot a single citation to back up the claim that less than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported. You conveniently omitted a very important disclaimer as well:
>The authors of this report are responsible for its content. Statements in the report should not be construed as endorsement by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services of a particular drug, device, test, treatment, or other clinical service. So, your screenshot is also dishonest as it markets these statements as official government endorsements in the citation without showing the disclaimer. For the record, this document was a proposal. Nothing more, nothing less.
>>13411042Patently true. Not a single "long covid" effect is found in someone who was asymptomatic. Every single one found was in someone who was hospitalized. You can easily prove me wrong by providing evidence of long covid found in someone who wasn't hospitalized for covid, and was asymptomatic while having it.
